Controversial amendment to the Commercial Companies Code

2 November 2022 | Knowledge, News

On 13 October 2022, the Act amending the Commercial Companies Code and certain other acts (the “Act”) entered into force. The following is a summary of the most significant changes and the effects they may have, including those which may turn out to be problematic for management boards of subsidiaries.

Holding law

When it comes to holding law, the Act has introduced a definition of a “group of companies” consisting of a parent company and its subsidiaries.

Companies belonging to a group of companies are to follow a common business strategy, respecting the interests of the group. The formation of a group of companies requires the adoption of a resolution on participation in that group and the group of companies being then registered with the National Court Register.

Mechanisms have also been introduced to enable parent companies to exercise uniform management over the company or its subsidiaries. Parent companies are also allowed to issue binding instructions to their subsidiaries, and refusing to comply with such directions will only be possible in certain cases.

In addition, parent companies are liable in damages to their subsidiaries (based on the principle of fault) for damage brought about by the subsidiary complying with a binding instruction, which has not been remedied within the time limit specified in such an instruction, and in certain cases are also liable to the creditors of a subsidiary.

The Act has aroused a great deal of controversy, with the legal community pointing to a number of problems arising from the introduced changes, in particular the marginalisation of the role of subsidiary management boards and the dilution of liability for damage caused to the company due to the introduced institution of a binding instruction.

New regulations for company bodies

The amendment also introduces new supervisory board tools which, according to lawmakers, are intended to enable more effective corporate governance. The most important changes in this respect include:

  • the obligation of the management board to provide certain information to the supervisory board on its own initiative without further request;
  • the right to select an advisor to the supervisory board to examine a specific matter concerning company operations or assets, and to prepare certain analyses and opinions;
  • the obligation to obtain approval for the conclusion of a transaction of significant value with a parent company, a subsidiary or a related company;
  • wider possibilities to request information and documents from i.a. management board members and employees;
  • extended obligations of reporting to shareholders (annual supervisory board reports to be submitted for the previous financial year).

The amendment has uniformly and comprehensively regulated the obligation to keep minutes of company management and supervisory board meetings, including their content.

The amendment has also clarified the moment of expiry of a mandate in connection with the expiry of the term of office of management and supervisory board members.

Under the new regulations, in the case of an appointment for a term of office exceeding one year, the mandate expires on the date on which shareholders’ meeting approving the financial statements for the last full financial year of office is held, with the term of office being calculated in full financial years. However, lawmakers allow this issue to be regulated differently within the articles of association.

Business Judgement Rule

Another major change is also the introduction of the Business Judgment Rule, which has been functioning so far in case law and considered valid in the views of legal scholars and commentators, allowing management and supervisory board members to avoid liability for damage caused to the company as a result of erroneous decisions, provided that these were taken within the boundaries of legitimate business risk and based on information adequate to the circumstances.

Accordingly, the activities of the bodies will be assessed not only through the prism of performance, but also taking into account the correctness of the decision-making process. In this context, professional reports or legal opinions may assume even greater importance.

How can we assist

Having analysed the changes to the Commercial Companies Code, we have developed specific solutions to make it easier for entrepreneurs to adapt their structures to the new regulations. We are ready to assist you with all activities aimed at implementing the amended regulations, and to answer all your questions in this respect.

Any questions? Contact the author directly

Adam Czarnota

Aneta Serowik

 


See also

Draft amendment to the Commercial Companies Code

Amendments to the Commercial Companies Code – the Business Judgment Rule and the interest of a group of companies

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

Contact us:

Aneta Serowik

Aneta Serowik

Advocate / Partner / Corporate law and disputes

+48 728 432 412

a.serowik@kochanski.pl

Adam Czarnota

Adam Czarnota

Advocate / Senior Associate / Corporate Law / Mergers & Acquisitions

+48 787 389 207

a.czarnota@kochanski.pl