Contributions in limited liability companies and joint-stock companies and the consequences for shareholders and Management Board members

26 June 2024 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

When setting up a business, it is necessary to provide the company with certain resources, i.e., among other things, to contribute the appropriate capital required to fully pay for the shares issued.

The need to recapitalise the company may also arise later, and one of the forms available is an increase in share capital and the related contribution to cover it.

Such contributions may take the following forms:

  • Cash contributions
  • Non-monetary contributions (contributions in kind), i.e. things and rights that are capable of being contributed

Depending on the type of company, the rules on restrictions and obligations regarding contributions in kind may differ.

Contributions in kind – Contributability

Contributability is defined as the quality of things and rights that makes them capable of being contributed to a company as a contribution in kind.

At the same time, the Commercial Companies Code explicitly states that a non-transferable right or the provision of work or services cannot be contributed to a limited liability company or a joint stock company (Article 14(1) of the Commercial Companies Code).

The regulations also specify what cannot be a contribution in kind.

In practice, a contribution in kind should be:

  • An existing asset
  • Transferable
  • Capable of being valued and being included as an asset in the company’s balance sheet
  • Capable of being the object of direct enforcement proceedings in order to satisfy creditors’ claims

Contributions with defects

In accordance with the Commercial Companies Code, if a shareholder makes a defective contribution in kind, the shareholder is obliged to compensate the company for the difference between the value stated in the articles of association and the sale value of the contribution. The articles of association may provide for further rights of the company in such a situation.

For example, a physical product in an unfinished state may represent a physical defect of a contribution in kind. On the other hand, the fact that the object of the contribution in kind is an item that is owned (wholly or partly) by a third party, or a situation where the contribution in kind is a right that does not exist, may constitute a legal defect.

The liability to compensate for the difference arises upon the occurrence of the defect and the resulting difference between the value of the contribution in kind as stated in the articles of association and its sale value. This is irrespective of whether or not the company has suffered any loss as a result.

Valuation of contributions in kind

The Commercial Companies Code does not impose any obligation to value contributions in kind made to a limited liability company.

The statutory requirement to value contributions in kind applies only to joint stock companies.

If the value of a contribution made to a limited liability company is overstated, the contributing shareholder and those members of the Management Board who were aware of this and nevertheless applied for the registration of the company or notified an increase in its share capital to the National Court Register, will be jointly and severally liable to the company (Article 175 § 1 of the Commercial Companies Code).

It is also possible that the obligation to compensate the limited liability company for the value of the contribution arises both from a physical or legal defect in the object of the contribution in kind and from an overvaluation of the contribution.

As in the case of a shareholder’s liability for defects in a contribution in kind made by them, liability for making an overvalued contribution in kind arises irrespective of whether the company has  suffered any loss as a result. In such a case, the shareholder of the limited liability company and the Management Board members aware of this are jointly and severally liable to compensate the company for the difference.

This is why it is so important to carefully check the physical and legal condition of contributions in kind to capital companies before making such contributions, and to state their value as calculated on the basis of a current and correct valuation.

Any questions? Contact us

Weronika Duchnowska

Latest Knowledge

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | June 2026

According to a statement published by GPW Benchmark, the reference rate administrator, and the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), which oversees the administrator, 31 December 2036 will be the last day on which the WIBID and WIBOR rates will be provided for all key fixing periods: 1 month (1M), 3 months (3M) and 6 months (6M).

How to correctly calculate length of service from 1 May 2026

New rules for calculating length of service have applied to private sector employers since the beginning of May 2026. With companies continuing to express concerns about the new framework, the Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy has addressed the most common questions. We look at the issues that are (still) troubling employers and how we can help.

Tax settlement agreement: A new tool in the General Tax Code

A draft bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UDER110) has been submitted for consideration by the Council of Ministers. The bill introduces the tax settlement agreement, a new form of amicable dispute resolution between taxpayers and the tax authority. The draft is open for inter-ministerial review and public consultation until 19 June, with the proposed date of entry into force being 1 January 2028. Below, we examine who may apply for a settlement agreement, when, and on what terms, and how the process may work in practice.

A revolutionary reform of Poland’s capital market – ETFs and the Qualified Investment Fund

Poland’s capital market is on the cusp of one of the most significant reforms in recent years, which will fundamentally reshape the regulatory framework for ETFs and introduce an entirely new investment vehicle: the Qualified Investment Fund (QIF/KFI). This is a response to market demands and presents an opportunity for Poland to close the gap with countries such as Luxembourg and Ireland, with the overarching objective of boosting competitiveness and stemming the outflow of investment capital abroad. The new regulations aim to deliver greater flexibility for investors and fund managers alike, while also aligning with current market trends and European standards. We examine what is changing in practice and what it means for all market participants.

Directive 2024/825 – the European Union’s response to greenwashing

Greenwashing poses one of the most significant challenges to the consumer protection framework in the European Union. As customers become increasingly environmentally conscious, brands are ever more inclined to leverage this interest by invoking the language of environmental protection, sustainable development and climate neutrality. Yet these claims do not always reflect the actual characteristics of their products or services. The EU has sought to bring systemic order to this area by clarifying the information obligations of traders and broadening the list of practices deemed unfair. We consider what these changes mean for businesses in practice.

GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2026: The Polish perspective on artificial intelligence law

Global Legal Insights (GLI) is a series of international publications by the Global Legal Group (GLG), authored by legal practitioners from around the world. It offers an up-to-date and highly practical guide to the applicable regulatory landscape, complemented by expert commentary on specific areas of law across different jurisdictions. In short: legislation and actionable know-how in one place.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

Contact us:

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala

Rafał Rapala / Attorney-at-law / Partner / Head of Corporate Law and Corporate Litigation / M&A, Private Equity

+48 608 444 650

r.rapala@kochanski.pl