Cloud migration after the Data Act: new rights, lower costs and greater freedom

20 October 2025 | Knowledge, News, The Right Focus

The Data Act[i] introduces new rules for switching between providers of data processing services, including cloud services (‘cloud switching’).

The aim is to limit practices that prevent such switching (‘vendor lock-in’), such as high exit fees and technical obstacles, and to ensure the interoperability of cloud services. Let’s take a look at what cloud users should pay particular attention to.

You will not be charged for switching

The Data Act provides for the gradual abolition of fees associated with cloud switching.

Until 12 January 2027, ‘cost-based fees’, which are limited to the actual costs incurred by the provider in connection with the migration process, are still permissible.

After this date, such fees will be prohibited. This means, in particular, that it will be illegal to charge data egress costs and other fees related to the migration process.

At the time of entering into a contract, the cloud service provider must inform the user of all potential costs associated with the switching process during the transition period. This regulation aims to make migration conditions predictable, enabling companies to plan their strategies without the risk of unexpected financial burdens.

Interoperability and functional equivalence

The Data Act places emphasis on the technical possibility of switching and on ensuring the continuity of service functionality.

It defines functional equivalence as ensuring that the destination service provides the customer with at least the minimum level of functionality they experienced with the source service.

In practice, this means that, following a switch, the new cloud service should deliver a comparable outcome when carrying out the same functions and operations.

Equivalence obligations particularly apply to IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service) providers. They must “take all reasonable measures in their power” to ensure that customers achieve functional equivalence after switching providers.

In other words, the current provider should provide the necessary tools, documentation, technical support and capabilities for migrating data and the application environment.

Providers of other types of services, including PaaS and SaaS, are required to provide open interfaces (APIs) for communication and data migration at no additional cost. These interfaces must contain sufficient information about the structure and formats of the data to enable interoperability.

Impact on contracts and technology

The Data Act introduces a number of new requirements regarding the wording of cloud service contracts.

Such a contract should explicitly regulate the switching process and include provisions that enable the customer to:

  • Transfer data and functionalities to a new provider or to their on-premises infrastructure ‘without undue delay’ and not after a 30-day migration period
  • Terminate the contract after a maximum notice period of 2 months
  • Have an exhaustive description of the data to be migrated and that which should be exempted in order to protect trade secrets
  • Obtain a guarantee that the data will be retrievable for at least 30 days after migration
  • Obtain a guarantee of the full erasure of their data by the service provider once the migration process is complete
  • Receive a description of possible switching charges

In addition, the contract may stipulate that, once the notice period has expired, the customer will decide whether to switch to a different provider, port the data to an on-premises infrastructure, or erase it.

Before concluding the contract, the provider must also provide the customer with information on migration procedures and data structures and formats, including technical specifications and standards.

These procedures, along with information on jurisdiction and infrastructure security, should be available on the provider’s website. Finally, the Data Act imposes a general obligation on all parties — the current and destination providers, as well as the customer — to cooperate in good faith to ensure a smooth switching process and continuity of service.

Data Act – exemptions and limitations

The legislature has provided exemptions from switching obligations, which generally apply to data processing service providers (including cloud service providers). These provisions do not require providers to develop new technologies or disclose protected information, particularly trade secrets or copyrighted content.

Furthermore, they do not apply to customised services, i.e. custom-built solutions for a single client that are not offered on a large scale, or trial versions/experimental services made available periodically. Before concluding a contract, providers should explicitly inform users if the service in question is subject to such exemptions.

Summary

The Data Act requires a significant change in approach to cloud services. Companies should review their contracts and start planning updates immediately. It is crucial to introduce appropriate switching provisions and remove or renegotiate exit fees. Companies must also prepare their infrastructure, both technically and organisationally, for interoperability and migration in accordance with the new regulations.

Any questions? Contact us

 

 

[i] Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 of the European Parliament and of the Council

 

Latest Knowledge

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | June 2026

According to a statement published by GPW Benchmark, the reference rate administrator, and the Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF), which oversees the administrator, 31 December 2036 will be the last day on which the WIBID and WIBOR rates will be provided for all key fixing periods: 1 month (1M), 3 months (3M) and 6 months (6M).

How to correctly calculate length of service from 1 May 2026

New rules for calculating length of service have applied to private sector employers since the beginning of May 2026. With companies continuing to express concerns about the new framework, the Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy has addressed the most common questions. We look at the issues that are (still) troubling employers and how we can help.

Tax settlement agreement: A new tool in the General Tax Code

A draft bill amending the General Tax Code (No. UDER110) has been submitted for consideration by the Council of Ministers. The bill introduces the tax settlement agreement, a new form of amicable dispute resolution between taxpayers and the tax authority. The draft is open for inter-ministerial review and public consultation until 19 June, with the proposed date of entry into force being 1 January 2028. Below, we examine who may apply for a settlement agreement, when, and on what terms, and how the process may work in practice.

A revolutionary reform of Poland’s capital market – ETFs and the Qualified Investment Fund

Poland’s capital market is on the cusp of one of the most significant reforms in recent years, which will fundamentally reshape the regulatory framework for ETFs and introduce an entirely new investment vehicle: the Qualified Investment Fund (QIF/KFI). This is a response to market demands and presents an opportunity for Poland to close the gap with countries such as Luxembourg and Ireland, with the overarching objective of boosting competitiveness and stemming the outflow of investment capital abroad. The new regulations aim to deliver greater flexibility for investors and fund managers alike, while also aligning with current market trends and European standards. We examine what is changing in practice and what it means for all market participants.

Directive 2024/825 – the European Union’s response to greenwashing

Greenwashing poses one of the most significant challenges to the consumer protection framework in the European Union. As customers become increasingly environmentally conscious, brands are ever more inclined to leverage this interest by invoking the language of environmental protection, sustainable development and climate neutrality. Yet these claims do not always reflect the actual characteristics of their products or services. The EU has sought to bring systemic order to this area by clarifying the information obligations of traders and broadening the list of practices deemed unfair. We consider what these changes mean for businesses in practice.

GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2026: The Polish perspective on artificial intelligence law

Global Legal Insights (GLI) is a series of international publications by the Global Legal Group (GLG), authored by legal practitioners from around the world. It offers an up-to-date and highly practical guide to the applicable regulatory landscape, complemented by expert commentary on specific areas of law across different jurisdictions. In short: legislation and actionable know-how in one place.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

Contact us:

Robert Brodzik

Robert Brodzik

Advocate / Counsel / NewTech / Data Protection and Cybersecurity

+48 532 206 479

r.brodzik@kochanski.pl