Changes in tax procedures and audits. Has the legislature accommodated taxpayers?

22 December 2025 | Knowledge, News, Tax Focus, The Right Focus

We recently discussed the current status of planned and implemented tax changes in detail. These include changes that are already in force, regulations planned for the coming months and solutions whose entry into force has been postponed.

This time, we focus on changes to tax procedures and audits that have already come into force and are of interest to everyone: taxpayers and practitioners alike. We present the key concepts, potential consequences, and practical aspects of application.

Submitting tax returns at various stages of customs and tax audits – a significant change in favour of taxpayers

One of the most significant amendments to the Act on the National Revenue Administration (KAS) is the extension of taxpayers’ rights to submit tax returns at various stages of customs and tax audits.

The new regulations overturn the previous rule of ‘no returns during audits’ and introduce a mechanism that enables taxpayers to respond to authorities’ findings.

Returns filed during audits

In accordance with Article 62(4) of the Act on the National Revenue Administration, in the context of customs and tax audits to check compliance with tax law, “the person being audited has the right to file a tax return […] within the scope of the audit, within 14 days of receiving authorisation for the audit”.

This means that taxpayers no longer have to wait passively for audits to be completed and their findings formalised; they can now actively respond at an early stage by submitting a tax return within the scope of the audit. This enables them to organise their tax settlements independently and potentially limit further adverse financial consequences.

Returns filed following receipt of audit results

Importantly, the opportunity for correction does not end with an audit’s completion.

In accordance with Article 82(2) of the Act on the National Revenue Administration, the audit results must include information on the right to file a return if the audited person agrees, either wholly or partially, with the identified irregularities.

Furthermore, pursuant to Article 82(3), the audited party has 14 days from the date of delivery of the audit results to submit a return, provided they accept the authority’s findings.

In practice, this provides an additional ‘time window’ to mitigate the adverse financial impact of the audit and submit a return.

Unremovable doubts as to the facts – change with reservations

Another significant change, which came into effect on 4 November 2025, was the introduction to the General Tax Code of the principle of resolving unremovable doubts in favour of the party concerned.

In accordance with the new Article 122 § 2 of the General Tax Code, any such doubts regarding the facts in tax proceedings initiated ex officio should be resolved in favour of the taxpayer. This change is widely regarded as positive and has long been advocated by practitioners.

However, at the same time, the legislature has introduced significant exceptions which may, in practice, limit the possibility of invoking this provision. This rule will not apply if:

  • Parties with conflicting interests are involved in the procedure, or the outcome of the procedure has a direct impact on the interests of other persons
  • The law requires a party to prove specific facts
  • Doing so would conflict with an important public interest, including a material interest of the state

The third exception, which concerns important public interest, raises particular concerns. The wording is very broad, leaving considerable discretion to tax authorities in its interpretation. This could result in numerous exemptions from this rule being granted in practice, effectively limiting its application.

It is worth noting that the above change applies to procedures that were initiated but not completed before the amendments came into force.

Changes to tax procedures strengthen the position of taxpayers

These changes should be viewed as a step towards improving taxpayers’ position, particularly during customs and tax audits and tax procedures. However, in practice, the effectiveness of the new regulations will depend on how they are applied by the tax authorities.

For this reason, taxpayers should make the new regulations part of their defence strategy during audits, using the available instruments as effectively as possible. Only by making conscious use of the new rights will it be possible to exploit the amendments’ full potential.

Any questions? Contact us

Latest Knowledge

Dual-use items: how broad will the CJEU’s definition be?

A training aircraft designed for civilian purposes can also qualify as a military item. That’s a conclusion emerging from the Advocate General’s Opinion in Case C-538/25 (Flugzeugherstellerin) before the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does this mean for companies exporting goods from the EU?

Workplace harassment and discrimination: new regulations for employers

The Sejm has passed an amendment to the Labour Code concerning workplace harassment and discrimination. The changes introduce a broader definition of the concept itself, new forms of harassment, clearer definitions of what constitutes, for example, sexual harassment, and new rules governing the handling of such cases, including the reversal of the burden of proof, higher compensation awards, and the jurisdiction of district courts. The provisions will enter into force on 5 November 2026. We examine what will change and how much time remains to adapt company documents, policies, and the organisation as a whole.

ESG Roadmap. How to identify which regulations apply to your business and build a strategy

As we know, ESG in business is a roadmap made up of numerous obligations arising from different regulatory frameworks. That is why the right question is not “how do I meet all the requirements?” but rather “which of them apply to my business?”. This is a crucial distinction. We explain how to correctly diagnose your regulatory profile and build an effective ESG strategy – one that actually works and gives you a competitive edge.

Announcement of Income Tax Reform

On 19 August, during a press conference, the Prime Minister announced a package of tax changes planned for next year. According to the announcement, the reform is intended, on the one hand, to ease the burden on the middle class and, on the other, to shift a greater fiscal burden onto the wealthiest individuals and the largest companies. We take a look at the proposals included in the announced package and explain what they might mean for taxpayers.

Family foundations and the tax authorities: what draft bill UD447 proposes and why this is not the end of the troubles

Family foundations were intended to provide entrepreneurs with a stable framework for intergenerational wealth management. Yet not even four years have passed since the first such foundations were established, and the rules governing their taxation are set to be changed once again. This is because the scale of interest and the practical problems uncovered have overwhelmed the drafters of the legislation, as best illustrated by the figures – 927 applications for individual tax rulings and 77 opinions issued from the Head of the National Revenue Administration. This does not, however, mean that family foundations are being used on a massive scale for aggressive tax optimisation. A significant proportion of the queries concerned simply how to correctly apply the complex regulations.

Banking today and tomorrow | Financial sector overview | August 2026

Poland’s banking sector has reacted with concern to recent remarks by Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz, the Minister of Development Funds and Regional Policy, who announced plans to put forward a proposal for a further increase in CIT levied on banks. The Minister’s reasoning, however, rests on a flawed conflation of the sector’s liquidity with its profitability, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of how the banking sector operates and how its financial health is assessed. What is more, it feeds into a worrying trend of replacing substantive debate with simplistic, populist messaging which may be politically appealing but is not underpinned by either facts or economic analysis.

NIS2 and the National Cybersecurity System Act in transport: what you need to do before October 2026

The amended Act on the National Cybersecurity System (UKSC) has been in force since 3 April 2026. For transport sector undertakings, this means a specific compliance timeline, including an obligation to register with the National Cybersecurity System (KSC) registry by 3 October 2026. Failure to do so may result in substantial financial penalties, coupled with the risk of personal liability for senior management. Not every undertaking, however, automatically falls within the scope of the new regime. Read on to find out whether your organisation is affected and what you need to do before the deadline for preparation.

Family foundations: the government has done the maths and presented the bill

Three years. That’s how long we’ve been waiting for what the Council of Ministers had seen in the data from the outset – and has now disclosed in its review of the Family Foundation Act. The document not only diagnoses the problems, but also previews substantial changes to rules that founders and their advisers treated as settled and stable. And therein lies a problem that goes far beyond tax matters. If the rules of the game are changed while the game is being played, there can be neither planning stability nor trust in the law. It is no coincidence that one of the greatest concerns among entrepreneurs considering setting up a foundation is not the level of taxation, but the stability of the legal framework – which today is once again being called into question.

Contact us:

Jan Janukowicz

Jan Janukowicz

Advocate Trainee / Senior Associate / Tax Law

+48 736 272 203

j.janukowicz@kochanski.pl