Changes in tax procedures and audits. Has the legislature accommodated taxpayers?

22 December 2025 | Knowledge, News, Tax Focus, The Right Focus

We recently discussed the current status of planned and implemented tax changes in detail. These include changes that are already in force, regulations planned for the coming months and solutions whose entry into force has been postponed.

This time, we focus on changes to tax procedures and audits that have already come into force and are of interest to everyone: taxpayers and practitioners alike. We present the key concepts, potential consequences, and practical aspects of application.

Submitting tax returns at various stages of customs and tax audits – a significant change in favour of taxpayers

One of the most significant amendments to the Act on the National Revenue Administration (KAS) is the extension of taxpayers’ rights to submit tax returns at various stages of customs and tax audits.

The new regulations overturn the previous rule of ‘no returns during audits’ and introduce a mechanism that enables taxpayers to respond to authorities’ findings.

Returns filed during audits

In accordance with Article 62(4) of the Act on the National Revenue Administration, in the context of customs and tax audits to check compliance with tax law, “the person being audited has the right to file a tax return […] within the scope of the audit, within 14 days of receiving authorisation for the audit”.

This means that taxpayers no longer have to wait passively for audits to be completed and their findings formalised; they can now actively respond at an early stage by submitting a tax return within the scope of the audit. This enables them to organise their tax settlements independently and potentially limit further adverse financial consequences.

Returns filed following receipt of audit results

Importantly, the opportunity for correction does not end with an audit’s completion.

In accordance with Article 82(2) of the Act on the National Revenue Administration, the audit results must include information on the right to file a return if the audited person agrees, either wholly or partially, with the identified irregularities.

Furthermore, pursuant to Article 82(3), the audited party has 14 days from the date of delivery of the audit results to submit a return, provided they accept the authority’s findings.

In practice, this provides an additional ‘time window’ to mitigate the adverse financial impact of the audit and submit a return.

Unremovable doubts as to the facts – change with reservations

Another significant change, which came into effect on 4 November 2025, was the introduction to the General Tax Code of the principle of resolving unremovable doubts in favour of the party concerned.

In accordance with the new Article 122 § 2 of the General Tax Code, any such doubts regarding the facts in tax proceedings initiated ex officio should be resolved in favour of the taxpayer. This change is widely regarded as positive and has long been advocated by practitioners.

However, at the same time, the legislature has introduced significant exceptions which may, in practice, limit the possibility of invoking this provision. This rule will not apply if:

  • Parties with conflicting interests are involved in the procedure, or the outcome of the procedure has a direct impact on the interests of other persons
  • The law requires a party to prove specific facts
  • Doing so would conflict with an important public interest, including a material interest of the state

The third exception, which concerns important public interest, raises particular concerns. The wording is very broad, leaving considerable discretion to tax authorities in its interpretation. This could result in numerous exemptions from this rule being granted in practice, effectively limiting its application.

It is worth noting that the above change applies to procedures that were initiated but not completed before the amendments came into force.

Changes to tax procedures strengthen the position of taxpayers

These changes should be viewed as a step towards improving taxpayers’ position, particularly during customs and tax audits and tax procedures. However, in practice, the effectiveness of the new regulations will depend on how they are applied by the tax authorities.

For this reason, taxpayers should make the new regulations part of their defence strategy during audits, using the available instruments as effectively as possible. Only by making conscious use of the new rights will it be possible to exploit the amendments’ full potential.

Any questions? Contact us

Latest Knowledge

GLI – AI, Machine Learning & Big Data 2026: The Polish perspective on artificial intelligence law

Global Legal Insights (GLI) is a series of international publications by the Global Legal Group (GLG), authored by legal practitioners from around the world. It offers an up-to-date and highly practical guide to the applicable regulatory landscape, complemented by expert commentary on specific areas of law across different jurisdictions. In short: legislation and actionable know-how in one place.

Banking sector overview | Banking today and tomorrow | May 2026

“The end of the dream of free housing” – this is how the Polish Bank Association (Związek Banków Polskich) has characterised Thursday’s judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in cases concerning whether the claims of financial institutions against CHF mortgage borrowers have become time-barred.

Return deposits like VAT? The elephant in the room: the risks of the deposit-return system

The deposit-return system was supposed to be simple. Eco-friendly. Leak-proof. Tax-neutral. However, it took just a few months for serious doubts to emerge. The first loopholes are no longer just theoretical, they are in plain sight. The mechanisms for abuse can be described quite precisely, and the scale of potential losses may be much greater than anticipated. Below, we examine where the system is losing control and how this can be addressed.

NZIA – “Made in Europe” becomes a condition of market participation in the energy sector

The European Union has adopted a strategic course aimed at building its own production capacity in key technology sectors, including energy technologies. This policy is embodied in the Net-Zero Industry Act (NZIA), which redefines the rules of competitiveness, inter alia, in the renewable energy sector. In tenders, auctions and public support schemes, price is no longer the sole criterion for selecting a supplier. The NZIA imposes on contracting authorities and entities administering support schemes an obligation to evaluate bids also on the basis of the origin of the technology and other criteria specified in the Regulation. This change is systemic in nature and will affect all market participants – both producers and purchasers of energy technologies. In this article, I analyse how the new EU regulations will translate into business practice for companies operating in the European market.

WHT – Obligation to verify the beneficial owner status when paying dividends. An advance tax ruling by the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre vs. explanations by the Minister of Finance

A Polish company paying dividends to a foreign parent company based in the EU may be exempt from withholding tax (WHT). When verifying eligibility for this exemption, is the company required to check whether the recipient of the dividend is its beneficial owner (BO)? It transpires that the Director of the National Revenue Administration Information Centre (KIS) and the Minister of Finance offer completely different answers to this question. What does this mean in practice? Let’s take a look.

Banking in 2026: technology, regulation and the new market landscape

The year 2026 will see the banking sector undergo its most dynamic transformation in a decade. The trends identified in Accenture’s Top Banking Trends FY26 report suggest that the sector is entering a phase in which technology and regulation will be inseparable, driving all aspects of change. However, it is regulation that determines the boundaries, pace and manner of implementation for new solutions. We take a look at what else the experts are focusing on.

Contact us:

Jan Janukowicz

Jan Janukowicz

Advocate Trainee / Associate / Tax Law

+48 736 272 203

j.janukowicz@kochanski.pl